What Is Sin?
by haRold Smith
a citizen of the Commonwealth
"If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin is crouching at the door. Its desire is against you, but you must rule over it ." Genesis 4:7
"In those days Israel had no king; all the people did whatever seemed right in their own eyes ." Judges 17.6
"...this is eternal life, that they know You the only true Elohim, and Yeshua haMashiach whom You have sent." John 17:3
What was Cain's sin? What was Adam's sin? In both of these biblical accounts, their downfall was in behaving contrarily to what they knew was the Nature of YHVH. In contrast, Abraham was lauded (click on highlighted words to view content) for obeying YHVH's Words and keeping His ordinances 430 years prior to Sinai because he behaved in accordance to the Nature of Spirit he had come to know. So, if being accepted into YHVH's Kingdom is, by nature, dependent on subscription to YHVH's covenant - then ignoring the clear expectations of the Lord of the Kingdom is sin. It is not possible to claim that the rules have changed if the Lord of the Kingdom hasn't changed and the constitution of the Kingdom hasn't changed. Sin is defined within the community of YHVH's Kingdom. So the Christian community, which by its own admission, is not the same community as the one established by YHVH at Sinai - has simply redefined the word. The issue is not a change in morality. The issue is about what kingdom am I a part of. Sabbath is a requirement of one - it is not a requirement of the other.
Hebrew is a language of remembering. The Hebrew verb used in Genesis 9:15 for the word translated as the English remember is zakar. Its definition in Hebrew, "mark or to remember", is much more than a mere mental assent. It involves action - to remember is to act on behalf of someone or something. Zakar is used in the Ten Words (with emphasis on verse one) in regard to the Sabbath: "Remember the Sabbath day". This Word is not telling us to "think about" or "recall" the Sabbath; it is telling us to DO something - and that something is to choose to enter into YHVH's REST. We encountered zakar in the article, the First Hebrew, where we found it to also be used to describe a man's purpose for being. The word translated "sin" in the verse from Genesis 4 above is hatta'ath. Lexicons typically offer "sin, sin-offering, expiation" as the meaning. But, in the Hebrew perspective the bible was written from, hatta'ath is understood as behavior which lies in opposition to the accepted cultural norms of YHVH's Kingdom. The root word hatta'ath is derived from is hata' and means "to miss the mark" - forgetfulness. Not remembering. In the midst of their individual situations, Adam and Cain forgot YHVH's Words - Abraham did not. It was the exercise of Abraham's faith that was counted to him as righteousness - not a mere acknowledgement of existence.
From this perspective, hatta'ath means a violation of a communal relationship standard - behavior that goes against the agreed upon order of things. For example, if the agreed upon order describes marriage as a union of a man and a woman, then homosexual "marriage" is not only not "marriage" - it is sin within YHVH's Kingdom. But, it is sin because it violates a standard - not because it is some eternal evil. YHVH's standard determines what is acceptable and what isn't within the culture of YHVH's Kingdom. But, to attempt to apply those standards to those who have not subscribed to YHVH's covenant is futile because they belong to another culture, another kingdom where the standard is different. The current cultural debate within America about homosexual marriage is precisely that - a cultural debate! It is an argument over what is acceptable in the culture of America and since the cultural meanings of the terms can change when the culture changes - so can the acceptable standards of behavior. For instance, today no one considers attending Christian Church in casual dress as sin, but 100 years ago - it would have been. From a cultural perspective, things change. There is no doubt that homosexuality will become an acceptable behavioral choice in American culture based upon the legal ground of equal rights that it is being argued from. But that is not true in every culture!
"…she will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Yeshua, because He will
save His people from their sins ." Matthew 1:21
Therefore, to become subject to "sin" is when someone becomes a subject of the Kingdom of YHVH. How others define "sin" makes little difference because they live in another kingdom. This is why legislating morality is inherently bankrupt in cultures where there is no absolute standard. In the end, it is simply a semantic argument. If there is no absolute, then the meanings of the terms can be redefined to suit the populace as their behavior changes. While we may think we know what is meant by "sin" today, it's not so clear that we understand what "sin" meant to the authors of our bible. And that's a problem. Words mean things and, if we don't know what they meant by the word, then we could hold ourselves accountable for ideas about sin that were never part of the biblical message. Wherever we have allowed a culture other than the Kingdom of YHVH to define what "sin" means to the life of a subject of the Kingdom of YHVH - we do not understand, or follow, the standard of the King of Righteousness. This is why (to the chagrin of many) the country of America and the religion of Christianity are not part of YHVH's Kingdom. Regardless of how they began, by redefining the words they have become kingdoms unto themselves (John 18:36). It is incumbent on all those who claim to embrace the Kingdom of YHVH to obey the King according to His standard. If the Word of the King is the law of the Kingdom, then redefining the terms is impossible. Now it simply becomes a matter of understanding what those terms actually mean in order to live in accordance with them.
Thanks to Augustine and Luther, however, the concept of sin often focuses primarily on the inward moral conscience. In Christian thought, sin is principally a personal affair that begins with cognitive mistakes. Descartes' Cogito ego sum has found its way into Christian theology with the notion that mental error is sin and is the genesis of outward behavioral sin. But Scripture takes a different approach. Scriptural sin is what I do, not generally what I think. Luther's idea that we sin every day in thought, word and deed does not reflect the cultural grounding of Mosaic Israel (see why I Am Not A Sinner). If we realize that sin is not an inner moral struggle to believe the right things in order to have the right spiritual attitude, we can understand why the opposite of hatta'ath is not righteousness but rather hesed which is found in the Nature of Spirit. Hebrew sin is doing what I have been told not to do. Pharisaical "works righteousness" is another invention of Augustine that was subsequently promoted by Luther. Are you aware that the word, "Judaizer", is not found in scripture? Were there religious men who thought they could earn YHVH's favor through their own efforts? Of course there were - just as we have them today in churches across the world. Every true follower of YHVH, however, knows that human effort cannot be the basis of YHVH's favor. Yeshua simply reminds His contemporaries what they already knew - YHVH is an Elohim of grace and obedience. But, you don't get one without the other.
"And then will I declare to them: I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of
Iniquity is another term that has been redefined from its original meaning to acquire a contemporary meaning of "moral sin". But, here is a subtlety that eludes us when just looking at the English translated words through a filter of religious tradition that has been handed down to us (Mark 7:13). The Greek word translated "iniquity" in this verse is anomia (taken from the root anomos) and means "the condition of without law, ignorant of and destitute of (the Mosaic) law - Torah". When read from the standpoint of what this word actually means, Yeshua's words take on an entirely different perspective. What He is actually saying is that He does not know those who do not abide by His Father's Words and will separate Himself from them. Wow! That simply blows up all the rhetoric over whether the Commandments are relevant for us today or not. Words mean things. Iniquity is the condition of living without Torah.
|"If anyone sins , doing any of the things that by YHVH's commandments ought not to be done, though he did not know it, then realizes his guilt, he shall bear his iniquity ." Leviticus 5:17|
In this verse from Leviticus, sin and iniquity carry two different meanings. As we have seen above, hata' (translated as the English "sin") means "to miss the mark", having to do with forgetfulness; whereas the Hebrew word 'avon (translated as the English "iniquity") deals with the consequences of that forgetfulness. Why is that important? It is important because, while we may be forgiven of our forgetfulness, that forgiveness does not extend to or repeal the consequence of our action as is illustrated in Yeshua's parable of Luke 12:48. We still bear the iniquity, the consequence of that action which is why we need to be obedient to the Nature of Spirit contained in YHVH's Words - so as to escape those consequences.
We often hear the words, "God loves the sinner but hates the sin." But now I am not so sure this is correct. If I choose to lie down in dark places, then - I am my sin! It’s not some alien force attached to me. It's not an infectious disease that demands a cure. It is me! In the same way I become Yeshua in this world by choosing to embrace the Life He exampled - I also become that person in bed with the dark places where I have chosen to abide. Who am I if I am not who I am now, the consequence of all my acts? But, YHVH hasn't deserted me in those dark places - He hasn't left me. He loves me - the sin that I have become (Psalm 139:8). It's difficult to come to terms with the Hebrew idea that YHVH really does weigh our deeds. We want forgiveness to remove all those past mistakes, but it seems as though there is a difference between guilt and consequence. Removing guilt allows me to walk in newness of life. It does not repair the results of the past. Consequences still get passed on. That doesn't mean YHVH isn't actively adjusting the outcomes. It only means that the chains of events I began because of my choices and the past choices of my ancestors are still there and must be dealt with. Chadash means renewed, not replaced. Chadash implies obligation to restore. There is something for me to do besides claim that I am no longer guilty. I have to make amends for what I have done. Then I will be free. (Psalm 51:10).
Part One, What Is Sin?
Part Two, The Sin of the World
Part Three, Who Is The Son?
Part Four, I Am Not A Sinner
|"Everyone who practices sin is violating Torah - indeed, sin is violation of Torah ." 1John 3:4|
Please feel free to email me at email@example.com. While not claiming to have all the answers, it would be an honor to partake with you of what the Spirit is uncovering.